PmWiki.SpaceTourism History

Show minor edits - Show changes to output

September 09, 2011, at 04:16 AM by 219.165.170.203 -
Changed lines 15-16 from:
* it reduces the cost of suborbital testing and experimentation for [[telebots]] and [[exovivaria]] in the near term.
to:
* it reduces the cost of [[microgravity]] testing and experimentation for [[telebots]] and [[exovivaria]] in the near term.
July 22, 2011, at 10:23 AM by 114.181.130.36 -
Changed lines 8-9 from:
However, a burgeoning orbital tourism indusry is not a necessary precondition for the Project's success.  Orbital tourism currently depends very much on access to facilities and hardware whose availability is contingent on good working relations between space-faring superpowers.  These superpower relations are far from being free of friction.  A sudden worsening of relations could end suborbital tourism indefinitely, but should only hamper the prospects for the Project.  Ideally, the Project is planned and designed so that, in the event of political interruptions in recreational uses of space, it can serve at least as a modest model of continuity in voluntary international cooperation in space.
to:
However, a burgeoning orbital tourism indusry is not a necessary precondition for the Project's success.  Orbital tourism currently depends very much on access to facilities and hardware whose availability is contingent on good working relations between space-faring superpowers.  These superpower relations are far from being free of friction.  A sudden worsening of relations could end suborbital tourism indefinitely, but should only hamper the prospects for the Project.  Ideally, the Project is planned and designed so that, in the event of political interruptions in recreational uses of space, it can serve at least as a modest model of continuity in voluntary transnational cooperation in space.
July 14, 2011, at 04:01 AM by 58.93.21.252 -
Changed lines 6-7 from:
[[Project Persephone]] takes the view that there are probably [[orbital tourism synergy | many synergies]] between its activities and those orbital space tourism.  The enduring success of orbital tourism will almost certainly help the Project greatly, and what's learned from the Project could help orbital space tourism toward enduring successes and wider markets.
to:
[[Project Persephone]] takes the view that there are probably [[orbital tourism synergy | many synergies]] between its activities and those of [[orbital space tourism]].  The enduring success of orbital tourism will almost certainly help the Project greatly, and what's learned from the Project could help orbital space tourism toward enduring successes and wider markets.
March 08, 2010, at 08:33 AM by 218.44.38.86 -
Changed lines 17-18 from:
If spaceports for suborbital flight prove to be popular tourist destinations, especially where national space programs already supply some relevant launch services as has been suggested,[^http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-local_nasa-report_0910sep10,0,6937729.story^],[^http://spaceports.blogspot.com/2009/03/virginia-approves-10-million-for.html^],[^http://www.delmarvanow.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009909090348^] siting Project Persephone exhibits and demonstrations at such spaceports is an idea that probably ought be explored for its potential value in education, recruiting of volunteers, and soliciting contributions. 
to:
If spaceports for suborbital flight prove to be popular tourist destinations, especially where national space programs already supply some relevant launch services as has been suggested,[^"Wallops may benefit from NASA strategy", September 10, 2009 http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-local_nasa-report_0910sep10,0,6937729.story^],[^http://spaceports.blogspot.com/2009/03/virginia-approves-10-million-for.html^],[^http://www.delmarvanow.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009909090348^] siting Project Persephone exhibits and demonstrations at such spaceports is an idea that probably ought be explored for its potential value in education, recruiting of volunteers, and soliciting contributions. 
March 08, 2010, at 08:24 AM by 218.44.38.86 -
Changed lines 6-7 from:
[[Project Persephone]] takes the view that there are probably [[orbital tourism synergies | many synergies]] between its activities and those orbital space tourism.  The enduring success of orbital tourism will almost certainly help the Project greatly, and what's learned from the Project could help orbital space tourism toward enduring successes and wider markets.
to:
[[Project Persephone]] takes the view that there are probably [[orbital tourism synergy | many synergies]] between its activities and those orbital space tourism.  The enduring success of orbital tourism will almost certainly help the Project greatly, and what's learned from the Project could help orbital space tourism toward enduring successes and wider markets.
March 08, 2010, at 08:23 AM by 218.44.38.86 -
Changed lines 6-7 from:
[[Project Persephone]] takes the view that there are probably many synergies between its activities and those orbital space tourism.  The enduring success of orbital tourism will almost certainly help the Project greatly, and what's learned from the Project could help orbital space tourism toward enduring successes and wider markets.
to:
[[Project Persephone]] takes the view that there are probably [[orbital tourism synergies | many synergies]] between its activities and those orbital space tourism.  The enduring success of orbital tourism will almost certainly help the Project greatly, and what's learned from the Project could help orbital space tourism toward enduring successes and wider markets.
March 08, 2010, at 08:21 AM by 218.44.38.86 -
Changed lines 10-11 from:
!!! Orbital Space Tourism
to:
!!! Sub-orbital Space Tourism
March 08, 2010, at 08:15 AM by 218.44.38.86 -
Added lines 3-5:

!!! Orbital Space Tourism

Added lines 10-11:
!!! Orbital Space Tourism
Changed lines 17-18 from:
If spaceports for suborbital flight prove to be popular tourist destinations, especially where national space programs already supply some relevant launch services as has been suggested,[^http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-local_nasa-report_0910sep10,0,6937729.story^],[^http://spaceports.blogspot.com/2009/03/virginia-approves-10-million-for.html^],[^http://www.delmarvanow.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009909090348^] siting Project Persephone exhibits and demonstrations at such spaceports is an idea that probably ought be explored for its potential value in education, recruiting of volunteers, and soliciting contributions.  However, the Project is not in any way predicated on some burgeoning market for recreational suborbital flight, which is still somewhat speculative and dependent on an unestablished safety record.  The technology-maturation value of experimentation and testing during periods of microgravity will still be available at facilities like [[drop towers]], on commercial flights such as those offered by Zero G, and with [[sounding rocket]]s, albeit at generally higher cost.
to:
If spaceports for suborbital flight prove to be popular tourist destinations, especially where national space programs already supply some relevant launch services as has been suggested,[^http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-local_nasa-report_0910sep10,0,6937729.story^],[^http://spaceports.blogspot.com/2009/03/virginia-approves-10-million-for.html^],[^http://www.delmarvanow.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009909090348^] siting Project Persephone exhibits and demonstrations at such spaceports is an idea that probably ought be explored for its potential value in education, recruiting of volunteers, and soliciting contributions. 

However, the Project is not in any way predicated on some burgeoning market for recreational suborbital flight, which is still somewhat speculative and dependent for success on establishing a solid safety record.  The technology-maturation value of microgravity experimentation and testing will still be available at facilities like [[drop towers]], on commercial flights such as those offered by Zero G, and with [[sounding rocket]]s, albeit at generally higher cost.
March 08, 2010, at 08:12 AM by 218.44.38.86 -
Changed lines 12-13 from:
If spaceports for suborbital flight prove to be popular tourist destinations, especially where national space programs already supply some relevant launch services as has been suggested,[^http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-local_nasa-report_0910sep10,0,6937729.story^],[^http://spaceports.blogspot.com/2009/03/virginia-approves-10-million-for.html^],[^http://www.delmarvanow.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009909090348^] siting Project Persephone exhibits and demonstrations at such spaceports is an idea that probably ought be explored for its potential value in education, recruiting of volunteers, and soliciting contributions.  However, the Project is not in any way predicated on some burgeoning market for recreational suborbital flight, which is still somewhat speculative and dependent on an unestablished safety record.  The technology-maturation value of experimentation and testing during periods of microgravity will still be available at facilities like [[drop tower]]s, on commercial flights such as those offered by Zero G, and with [[sounding rocket]]s, albeit at generally higher cost.
to:
If spaceports for suborbital flight prove to be popular tourist destinations, especially where national space programs already supply some relevant launch services as has been suggested,[^http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-local_nasa-report_0910sep10,0,6937729.story^],[^http://spaceports.blogspot.com/2009/03/virginia-approves-10-million-for.html^],[^http://www.delmarvanow.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009909090348^] siting Project Persephone exhibits and demonstrations at such spaceports is an idea that probably ought be explored for its potential value in education, recruiting of volunteers, and soliciting contributions.  However, the Project is not in any way predicated on some burgeoning market for recreational suborbital flight, which is still somewhat speculative and dependent on an unestablished safety record.  The technology-maturation value of experimentation and testing during periods of microgravity will still be available at facilities like [[drop towers]], on commercial flights such as those offered by Zero G, and with [[sounding rocket]]s, albeit at generally higher cost.
September 14, 2009, at 03:09 AM by 114.181.137.230 -
Changed lines 12-13 from:
If spaceports for suborbital flight prove to be popular tourist destinations, especially where national space programs already supply some relevant launch services as has been suggested,[^http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-local_nasa-report_0910sep10,0,6937729.story^],[^http://spaceports.blogspot.com/2009/03/virginia-approves-10-million-for.html^] siting Project Persephone exhibits and demonstrations at such spaceports is an idea that probably ought be explored for its potential value in education, recruiting of volunteers, and soliciting contributions.  However, the Project is not in any way predicated on some burgeoning market for recreational suborbital flight, which is still somewhat speculative and dependent on an unestablished safety record.  The technology-maturation value of experimentation and testing during periods of microgravity will still be available at facilities like [[drop tower]]s, on commercial flights such as those offered by Zero G, and with [[sounding rocket]]s, albeit at generally higher cost.
to:
If spaceports for suborbital flight prove to be popular tourist destinations, especially where national space programs already supply some relevant launch services as has been suggested,[^http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-local_nasa-report_0910sep10,0,6937729.story^],[^http://spaceports.blogspot.com/2009/03/virginia-approves-10-million-for.html^],[^http://www.delmarvanow.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009909090348^] siting Project Persephone exhibits and demonstrations at such spaceports is an idea that probably ought be explored for its potential value in education, recruiting of volunteers, and soliciting contributions.  However, the Project is not in any way predicated on some burgeoning market for recreational suborbital flight, which is still somewhat speculative and dependent on an unestablished safety record.  The technology-maturation value of experimentation and testing during periods of microgravity will still be available at facilities like [[drop tower]]s, on commercial flights such as those offered by Zero G, and with [[sounding rocket]]s, albeit at generally higher cost.
September 14, 2009, at 02:57 AM by 114.181.137.230 -
Changed lines 12-13 from:
If spaceports for suborbital flight prove to be popular tourist destinations, especially where national space programs already supply some relevant launch services as has been suggested,[^http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-local_nasa-report_0910sep10,0,6937729.story^] siting Project Persephone exhibits and demonstrations at such spaceports is an idea that probably ought be explored for its potential value in education, recruiting of volunteers, and soliciting contributions.  However, the Project is not in any way predicated on some burgeoning market for recreational suborbital flight, which is still somewhat speculative and dependent on an unestablished safety record.  The technology-maturation value of experimentation and testing during periods of microgravity will still be available at facilities like [[drop tower]]s, on commercial flights such as those offered by Zero G, and with [[sounding rocket]]s, albeit at generally higher cost.
to:
If spaceports for suborbital flight prove to be popular tourist destinations, especially where national space programs already supply some relevant launch services as has been suggested,[^http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-local_nasa-report_0910sep10,0,6937729.story^],[^http://spaceports.blogspot.com/2009/03/virginia-approves-10-million-for.html^] siting Project Persephone exhibits and demonstrations at such spaceports is an idea that probably ought be explored for its potential value in education, recruiting of volunteers, and soliciting contributions.  However, the Project is not in any way predicated on some burgeoning market for recreational suborbital flight, which is still somewhat speculative and dependent on an unestablished safety record.  The technology-maturation value of experimentation and testing during periods of microgravity will still be available at facilities like [[drop tower]]s, on commercial flights such as those offered by Zero G, and with [[sounding rocket]]s, albeit at generally higher cost.
September 14, 2009, at 02:51 AM by 114.181.137.230 -
Changed lines 12-14 from:
If spaceports for suborbital flight prove to be popular tourist destinations, especially where national space programs already supply some relevant launch services as has been suggested,[^http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-local_nasa-report_0910sep10,0,6937729.story^] siting Project Persephone exhibits and demonstrations at such spaceports is an idea that probably ought be explored for its potential value in education, recruiting of volunteers, and soliciting contributions.  However, the Project is not in any way predicated on some burgeoning market for recreational suborbital flight, which is still somewhat speculative and dependent on an unestablished safety record.  The technology-maturation value of experimentation and testing during periods of microgravity will still be available at facilities like [[drop tower]]s, on commercial flights such as those offered by Zero G, and with [[sounding rocket]]s, albeit at generally higher cost.
to:
If spaceports for suborbital flight prove to be popular tourist destinations, especially where national space programs already supply some relevant launch services as has been suggested,[^http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-local_nasa-report_0910sep10,0,6937729.story^] siting Project Persephone exhibits and demonstrations at such spaceports is an idea that probably ought be explored for its potential value in education, recruiting of volunteers, and soliciting contributions.  However, the Project is not in any way predicated on some burgeoning market for recreational suborbital flight, which is still somewhat speculative and dependent on an unestablished safety record.  The technology-maturation value of experimentation and testing during periods of microgravity will still be available at facilities like [[drop tower]]s, on commercial flights such as those offered by Zero G, and with [[sounding rocket]]s, albeit at generally higher cost.

[^#^]
September 14, 2009, at 02:50 AM by 114.181.137.230 -
Changed line 12 from:
If spaceports for suborbital flight prove to be popular tourist destinations, siting Project Persephone exhibits and demonstrations at spaceports is an idea that should be explored for its potential value in education, recruiting of volunteers, and soliciting contributions.  However, the Project is not in any way predicated on some burgeoning market for recreational suborbital flight, which is still somewhat speculative.  The technology-maturation value of experimentation and testing during periods of microgravity will still be available at facilities like [[drop tower]]s, on commercial flights such as those offered by Zero G, and with [[sounding rocket]]s, albeit at generally higher cost.
to:
If spaceports for suborbital flight prove to be popular tourist destinations, especially where national space programs already supply some relevant launch services as has been suggested,[^http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-local_nasa-report_0910sep10,0,6937729.story^] siting Project Persephone exhibits and demonstrations at such spaceports is an idea that probably ought be explored for its potential value in education, recruiting of volunteers, and soliciting contributions.  However, the Project is not in any way predicated on some burgeoning market for recreational suborbital flight, which is still somewhat speculative and dependent on an unestablished safety record.  The technology-maturation value of experimentation and testing during periods of microgravity will still be available at facilities like [[drop tower]]s, on commercial flights such as those offered by Zero G, and with [[sounding rocket]]s, albeit at generally higher cost.
September 14, 2009, at 02:27 AM by 114.181.137.230 -
Changed lines 3-6 from:
[[Project Persephone]] takes the view that the are probably many synergies between its activities and orbital space tourism.  Rhe enduring success of orbital tourism will almost certainly help the Project greatly, and what's learned from the Project could help orbital space tourism toward enduring successes and wider markets.

However, a burgeoning orbital tourism indusry is not a necessary precondition for the Project's success.  Orbital tourism currently depends very much on access to facilities and hardware whose availability is contingent on good working relations between space-faring superpowers.  These superpower relations are far from being free of friction.  A sudden worsening of relations could end suborbital tourism indefinitely, but should only hamper the prospects for the Project.
to:
[[Project Persephone]] takes the view that there are probably many synergies between its activities and those orbital space tourism.  The enduring success of orbital tourism will almost certainly help the Project greatly, and what's learned from the Project could help orbital space tourism toward enduring successes and wider markets.

However, a burgeoning orbital tourism indusry is not a necessary precondition for the Project's success.  Orbital tourism currently depends very much on access to facilities and hardware whose availability is contingent on good working relations between space-faring superpowers.  These superpower relations are far from being free of friction.  A sudden worsening of relations could end suborbital tourism indefinitely, but should only hamper the prospects for the Project.  Ideally, the Project is planned and designed so that, in the event of political interruptions in recreational uses of space, it can serve at least as a modest model of continuity in voluntary international cooperation in space.
September 14, 2009, at 02:25 AM by 114.181.137.230 -
Changed lines 1-2 from:
Space Tourism is a blanket term currently covering both commercial orbital space travel ("[[Orbital space tourism]]) and the more speculative market for cheaper suborbital space tourism ("[[suborbital flight]]").
to:
Space Tourism is a blanket term currently covering both commercial orbital space travel ("[[Orbital space tourism]]") and the more speculative market for cheaper suborbital space tourism ("[[suborbital flight]]").
September 14, 2009, at 02:24 AM by 114.181.137.230 -
Changed lines 3-5 from:
[[Project Persephone]] takes the view that the enduring success of orbital space tourism will almost certainly help the Project, and that what's learned from the Project could be useful for orbital space tourism.  However, a burgeoning orbital tourism indusry is not a necessary precondition for the Project's success.  Orbital tourism is currently dependent on relations between space-faring superpowers, and these relations are far from being free of friction.

Suborbital flight is interesting for Project Persephone mainly in how it might prime the market for orbital space tourism, and for how it might reduce the cost of suborbital testing and experimentation for [[telebots]] and [[exovivaria]].  If spaceports for suborbital flight prove to be popular tourist destinations, siting explanatory exhibits and demonstrations at spaceports should be explored
for its value in outreach and recruiting of volunteers.  However, the Project is not in any way predicted on a burgeoning market for recreational suborbital flight.  The technological value of brief periods of microgravity should still be available at facilities like [[drop tower]]s, on commercial flights such as those offered by Zero G, and with [[sounding rocket]]s.
to:
[[Project Persephone]] takes the view that the are probably many synergies between its activities and orbital space tourism.  Rhe enduring success of orbital tourism will almost certainly help the Project greatly, and what's learned from the Project could help orbital space tourism toward enduring successes and wider markets.

However, a burgeoning orbital
tourism indusry is not a necessary precondition for the Project's success.  Orbital tourism currently depends very much on access to facilities and hardware whose availability is contingent on good working relations between space-faring superpowers.  These superpower relations are far from being free of friction.  A sudden worsening of relations could end suborbital tourism indefinitely, but should only hamper the prospects for the Project.

Suborbital flight is a very different experience category, and probably less important
for the Project.  It is interesting mainly insofar as:

* a vibrant market for it might help prime the market for orbital space tourism in the longer run,
* it reduces the cost
of suborbital testing and experimentation for [[telebots]] and [[exovivaria]] in the near term.

If spaceports for suborbital flight prove to be popular tourist destinations, siting Project Persephone exhibits and demonstrations at spaceports is an idea that should be explored for its potential value in education, recruiting of volunteers, and soliciting contributions.  However, the Project is not in any way predicated on some burgeoning market for recreational suborbital flight, which is still somewhat speculative.  The technology-maturation value of experimentation and testing during periods of microgravity will still be available at facilities like [[drop tower]]s, on commercial flights such as those offered by Zero G, and with [[sounding rocket]]s, albeit at generally higher cost
.
September 14, 2009, at 02:05 AM by 114.181.137.230 -
Changed lines 3-5 from:
[[Project Persephone]] takes the view that the enduring success of orbital space tourism is almost certain a useful precondition for its own success, but not necessarily a critical one.  Suborbital flight is interesting for Project Persephone mainly in how it might prime the market for orbital space tourism, and for how it might reduce the cost of suborbital testing and experimentation for [[telebots]] and [[exovivaria]].
to:
[[Project Persephone]] takes the view that the enduring success of orbital space tourism will almost certainly help the Project, and that what's learned from the Project could be useful for orbital space tourism.  However, a burgeoning orbital tourism indusry is not a necessary precondition for the Project's success.  Orbital tourism is currently dependent on relations between space-faring superpowers, and these relations are far from being free of friction.

Suborbital flight is interesting for Project Persephone mainly in how it might prime the market for orbital space tourism, and for how it might reduce the cost of suborbital testing and experimentation for [[telebots]] and [[exovivaria]].  If spaceports for suborbital flight prove to be popular tourist destinations, siting explanatory exhibits and demonstrations at spaceports should be explored for its value in outreach and recruiting of volunteers.  However, the Project is not in any way predicted on a burgeoning market for recreational suborbital flight.  The technological value of brief periods of microgravity should still be available at facilities like [[drop tower]]s, on commercial flights such as those offered by Zero G, and with [[sounding rocket]]s
.
September 14, 2009, at 01:57 AM by 114.181.137.230 -
Added lines 1-3:
Space Tourism is a blanket term currently covering both commercial orbital space travel ("[[Orbital space tourism]]) and the more speculative market for cheaper suborbital space tourism ("[[suborbital flight]]").

[[Project Persephone]] takes the view that the enduring success of orbital space tourism is almost certain a useful precondition for its own success, but not necessarily a critical one.  Suborbital flight is interesting for Project Persephone mainly in how it might prime the market for orbital space tourism, and for how it might reduce the cost of suborbital testing and experimentation for [[telebots]] and [[exovivaria]].
GlossyBlue theme adapted by David Gilbert
Powered by PmWiki