PmWiki.Biophilia History

Show minor edits - Show changes to output

October 29, 2019, at 04:26 AM by 121.114.154.235 - mojibake
Changed lines 5-6 from:
"... biophilia is everywhere: people walking their dogs and stroking their cats, kneeling in their gardens. The love of homeland that is celebrated in so much of our art and literature. Children’s love of animals, their affection even for reasonable replicas of living things—teddy bears and rubber ducks. The furry seal-eyed robots used to comfort elderly people in Japanese nursing homes. Biophilia enters human hearts and minds in many ways." ([[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Truett_Anderson | Walter Truett Anderson]])[^Walter Truett Anderson, [[http://www.metanexus.net/magazine/tabid/68/id/10867/Default.aspx | "The Making of a New Biophilia: Evolutionary Governance and the Modern Creation Myth"]], [[http://www.metanexus.net/magazine/tabid/68/id/10867/Default.aspx | Metanexus Institute]], 2009^]
to:
"... biophilia is everywhere: people walking their dogs and stroking their cats, kneeling in their gardens. The love of homeland that is celebrated in so much of our art and literature. Children(s love of animals, their affection even for reasonable replicas of living things'teddy bears and rubber ducks. The furry seal-eyed robots used to comfort elderly people in Japanese nursing homes. Biophilia enters human hearts and minds in many ways." ([[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Truett_Anderson | Walter Truett Anderson]])[^Walter Truett Anderson, [[http://www.metanexus.net/magazine/tabid/68/id/10867/Default.aspx | "The Making of a New Biophilia: Evolutionary Governance and the Modern Creation Myth"]], [[http://www.metanexus.net/magazine/tabid/68/id/10867/Default.aspx | Metanexus Institute]], 2009^]
Changed line 25 from:
-> Evolutionary governance is richly and unavoidably participatory. It is not even restricted to human activities predators govern the growth of populations they prey on but humans, with their ability to make and use tools, organize societies to hunt and gather, burn forests to create pasture, domesticate and breed animals, intervened in countless new ways. And even today, although the inequities in human power are enormous, even the humblest peasant farmer manipulates the lives of the plants and animals in his or her domain; that is what agriculture is. (Walter Truett Anderson)[^Andersen, op. cit.^]
to:
-> Evolutionary governance is richly and unavoidably participatory. It is not even restricted to human activities -- predators govern the growth of populations they prey on -- but humans, with their ability to make and use tools, organize societies to hunt and gather, burn forests to create pasture, domesticate and breed animals, intervened in countless new ways. And even today, although the inequities in human power are enormous, even the humblest peasant farmer manipulates the lives of the plants and animals in his or her domain; that is what agriculture is. (Walter Truett Anderson)[^Andersen, op. cit.^]
October 28, 2012, at 05:51 AM by 219.167.13.29 -
Changed line 39 from:
to:
* [[http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://ldt.stanford.edu/~educ39109/POMI/ROSE/documents/ROSEstudy_Feb_2011_India_0331.pdf | "ROSE: Remotely Operated Science Experiment"]], Paul Kim, Aaron Sharp, Kevin Bing-Yung Wong, Arafeh Karimi, Kamakshi Duvvuru; Stanford University, Feb 2011.
Changed lines 1-2 from:
''biophila'' - love of living things or systems.
to:
''biophilia'' - love of living things or living systems.
August 03, 2011, at 08:16 AM by 114.181.130.36 -
Changed line 20 from:
%rfloat% http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4b/The_Nile_and_Egypt_by_day.jpg/120px-The_Nile_and_Egypt_by_day.jpg
to:
%rfloat% http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1d/INTELSAT_VI_F3_Spins_Out_of_STS-49_Cargo_Bay.jpg/120px-INTELSAT_VI_F3_Spins_Out_of_STS-49_Cargo_Bay.jpg
August 03, 2011, at 07:59 AM by 114.181.130.36 -
Changed lines 20-23 from:
It's been hypothesized that the [[Overview Effect]] is a manifestation of biophilia.  This is particularly interesting because, from space, no individual living thing on the ground is visible.

Biophilia remains an intuitively appealing but scientifically debatable hypothesis
.
to:
%rfloat% http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4b/The_Nile_and_Egypt_by_day.jpg/120px-The_Nile_and_Egypt_by_day.jpg
It's been hypothesized that the [[Overview Effect]] is a manifestation of biophilia.  This is particularly interesting because, from space, no individual living thing on the ground is visible. Like the Overview Effect,
Biophilia remains an intuitively appealing but scientifically debatable hypothesis.
Changed line 27 from:
%rframe% | http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Woman_farmer_in_Kenya.jpg/120px-Woman_farmer_in_Kenya.jpg | [[Tanzania]] farm
to:
%rframe% http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Woman_farmer_in_Kenya.jpg/120px-Woman_farmer_in_Kenya.jpg | [[Tanzania]] farm
August 03, 2011, at 07:45 AM by 114.181.130.36 -
Added line 28:
%rframe% | http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Woman_farmer_in_Kenya.jpg/120px-Woman_farmer_in_Kenya.jpg | [[Tanzania]] farm
August 03, 2011, at 07:39 AM by 114.181.130.36 -
Changed lines 28-29 from:
[[Project Persephone]] is, among other things, an experiment in the limits of biophilia as a motivation for participatory governance. Does the limited range of species possible in [[exovivaria]] also limit affection? What about the distance and perhaps communication delays? Which affective motivations do the Project's modes of interaction and governance attenuate? Which do they enhance?
to:
[[Project Persephone]] is, among other things, an experiment in the limits of biophilia as a motivation for participatory governance. Does the limited range of species possible in [[exovivaria]] also limit affection? What about the distance to exovivaria, the fact that they can be only seen, not touched, and perhaps communication delays as well? Which affective motivations do the Project's modes of interaction and governance attenuate? Which do they enhance?
August 03, 2011, at 07:37 AM by 114.181.130.36 -
Changed lines 5-6 from:
"... biophilia is everywhere: people walking their dogs and stroking their cats, kneeling in their gardens. The love of homeland that is celebrated in so much of our art and literature. Children’s love of animals, their affection even for reasonable replicas of living things—teddy bears and rubber ducks. The furry seal-eyed robots used to comfort elderly people in Japanese nursing homes. Biophilia enters human hearts and minds in many ways." ([[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Truett_Anderson | Walter Truett Anderson]])
to:
"... biophilia is everywhere: people walking their dogs and stroking their cats, kneeling in their gardens. The love of homeland that is celebrated in so much of our art and literature. Children’s love of animals, their affection even for reasonable replicas of living things—teddy bears and rubber ducks. The furry seal-eyed robots used to comfort elderly people in Japanese nursing homes. Biophilia enters human hearts and minds in many ways." ([[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Truett_Anderson | Walter Truett Anderson]])[^Walter Truett Anderson, [[http://www.metanexus.net/magazine/tabid/68/id/10867/Default.aspx | "The Making of a New Biophilia: Evolutionary Governance and the Modern Creation Myth"]], [[http://www.metanexus.net/magazine/tabid/68/id/10867/Default.aspx | Metanexus Institute]], 2009^]
Changed lines 11-13 from:
"Biophilia" was apparently coined by the social psychologist and humanistic philosopher [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_Fromm | Erich Fromm]], in his 1964 book ''[[http://books.google.com/books?ei=WT1xSv63Bov8lQTT7ODfDg&id=mQ0sBzIVP8UC&dq=Fromm+heart.of.man&q=biophilia | ''The Heart of Man: Its Genius for Good and Evil'']].  Fromm did not specifically bring ecological concerns to his discussion (ref. Anderson).  However, in his analysis of the Judeo-Christian creation myth, he identified an allegory that was not just negative, but positive as well: it gave human beings the freedom to "to make [their] own history, to develop [their] human powers, and to attain a new harmony with nature."

to:
"Biophilia" was apparently coined by the social psychologist and humanistic philosopher [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_Fromm | Erich Fromm]].[^In his 1964 book [[http://books.google.com/books?ei=WT1xSv63Bov8lQTT7ODfDg&id=mQ0sBzIVP8UC&dq=Fromm+heart.of.man&q=biophilia | ''The Heart of Man: Its Genius for Good and Evil'']]^]  Fromm did not specifically bring ecological concerns to his discussion (ref. Anderson).  However, in his analysis of the Judeo-Christian creation myth, he identified an allegory that was not just negative, but positive as well: it gave human beings the freedom to "to make [their] own history, to develop [their] human powers, and to attain a new harmony with nature."

Changed lines 26-29 from:
-> Evolutionary governance is richly and unavoidably participatory. It is not even restricted to human activities — predators govern the growth of populations they prey on — but humans, with their ability to make and use tools, organize societies to hunt and gather, burn forests to create pasture, domesticate and breed animals, intervened in countless new ways. And even today, although the inequities in human power are enormous, even the humblest peasant farmer manipulates the lives of the plants and animals in his or her domain; that is what agriculture is. (Walter Truett Anderson) 

[[Project Persephone]] is, among other things, an experiment in the limits of biophilia as a motivation for participatory governance.  Does the limited range of species possible in [[exovivaria]] also limit affection?  Which affective motivations do the Project's modes of interaction and governance attenuate?  Which do they enhance?
to:
-> Evolutionary governance is richly and unavoidably participatory. It is not even restricted to human activities — predators govern the growth of populations they prey on — but humans, with their ability to make and use tools, organize societies to hunt and gather, burn forests to create pasture, domesticate and breed animals, intervened in countless new ways. And even today, although the inequities in human power are enormous, even the humblest peasant farmer manipulates the lives of the plants and animals in his or her domain; that is what agriculture is. (Walter Truett Anderson)[^Andersen, op. cit.^]

[[Project Persephone]] is
, among other things, an experiment in the limits of biophilia as a motivation for participatory governance. Does the limited range of species possible in [[exovivaria]] also limit affection? What about the distance and perhaps communication delays? Which affective motivations do the Project's modes of interaction and governance attenuate? Which do they enhance?

!!! References

[^#^]

Deleted line 34:
* "[[http://www.metanexus.net/Magazine/Default.aspx?TabId=68&id=10867&SkinSrc=%5BG%5DSkins%2F_default%2FNo+Skin&ContainerSrc=%5BG%5DContainers%2F_default%2FNo+Container#_edn5 | The Making of a New Biophilia: Evolutionary Governance and the Modern Creation Myth]]", Walter Truett Anderson, in '''The Global Spiral''' (website), Metanexus Institute, 2006.
July 14, 2011, at 04:59 AM by 58.93.21.252 -
Changed lines 3-4 from:
->... biophilia is everywhere: people walking their dogs and stroking their cats, kneeling in their gardens. The love of homeland that is celebrated in so much of our art and literature. Children’s love of animals, their affection even for reasonable replicas of living things—teddy bears and rubber ducks. The furry seal-eyed robots used to comfort elderly people in Japanese nursing homes. Biophilia enters human hearts and minds in many ways. ([[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Truett_Anderson | Walter Truett Anderson]])
to:
%lfloat% http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5b/Alabama_red-bellied_turtle_hatchling_head_view_view.jpg/240px-Alabama_red-bellied_turtle_hatchling_head_view_view.jpg

"... biophilia is everywhere: people walking
their dogs and stroking their cats, kneeling in their gardens. The love of homeland that is celebrated in so much of our art and literature. Children’s love of animals, their affection even for reasonable replicas of living things—teddy bears and rubber ducks. The furry seal-eyed robots used to comfort elderly people in Japanese nursing homes. Biophilia enters human hearts and minds in many ways." ([[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Truett_Anderson | Walter Truett Anderson]])
July 14, 2011, at 04:43 AM by 58.93.21.252 -
Changed lines 3-4 from:
->... biophilia is everywhere: people walking their dogs and stroking their cats, kneeling in their gardens. The love of homeland that is celebrated in so much of our art and literature. Children’s love of animals, their affection even for reasonable replicas of living things—teddy bears and rubber ducks. The furry seal-eyed robots used to comfort elderly people in Japanese nursing homes. Biophilia enters human hearts and minds in many ways. (Walter Truett Anderson)
to:
->... biophilia is everywhere: people walking their dogs and stroking their cats, kneeling in their gardens. The love of homeland that is celebrated in so much of our art and literature. Children’s love of animals, their affection even for reasonable replicas of living things—teddy bears and rubber ducks. The furry seal-eyed robots used to comfort elderly people in Japanese nursing homes. Biophilia enters human hearts and minds in many ways. ([[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Truett_Anderson | Walter Truett Anderson]])
July 14, 2011, at 04:41 AM by 58.93.21.252 -
Changed lines 7-8 from:
%lfloat%http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Fromm.jpg/75px-Fromm.jpg
to:
%rfloat%http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Fromm.jpg/75px-Fromm.jpg
Changed lines 14-15 from:
%lfloat% http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a5/E._O._Wilson_sitting%2C_October_16%2C_2007.jpg/100px-E._O._Wilson_sitting%2C_October_16%2C_2007.jpg
to:
%rfloat% http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a5/E._O._Wilson_sitting%2C_October_16%2C_2007.jpg/100px-E._O._Wilson_sitting%2C_October_16%2C_2007.jpg
July 14, 2011, at 04:41 AM by 58.93.21.252 -
Added lines 14-15:
%lfloat% http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a5/E._O._Wilson_sitting%2C_October_16%2C_2007.jpg/100px-E._O._Wilson_sitting%2C_October_16%2C_2007.jpg
July 14, 2011, at 04:38 AM by 58.93.21.252 -
Changed lines 7-9 from:
"Biophilia" was apparently coined by the social psychologist and humanistic philosopher [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_Fromm | Eric Fromm]], in his 1964 book ''[[http://books.google.com/books?ei=WT1xSv63Bov8lQTT7ODfDg&id=mQ0sBzIVP8UC&dq=Fromm+heart.of.man&q=biophilia | ''The Heart of Man: Its Genius for Good and Evil'']].  Fromm did not specifically bring ecological concerns to his discussion (ref. Anderson).  However, in his analysis of the Judeo-Christian creation myth, he identified an allegory that was not just negative, but positive as well: it gave human beings the freedom to "to make [their] own history, to develop [their] human powers, and to attain a new harmony with nature."

to:
%lfloat%http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Fromm.jpg/75px-Fromm.jpg

"Biophilia" was apparently coined by the social psychologist and humanistic philosopher [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_Fromm | Erich
Fromm]], in his 1964 book ''[[http://books.google.com/books?ei=WT1xSv63Bov8lQTT7ODfDg&id=mQ0sBzIVP8UC&dq=Fromm+heart.of.man&q=biophilia | ''The Heart of Man: Its Genius for Good and Evil'']].  Fromm did not specifically bring ecological concerns to his discussion (ref. Anderson).  However, in his analysis of the Judeo-Christian creation myth, he identified an allegory that was not just negative, but positive as well: it gave human beings the freedom to "to make [their] own history, to develop [their] human powers, and to attain a new harmony with nature."

Added lines 3-4:
->... biophilia is everywhere: people walking their dogs and stroking their cats, kneeling in their gardens. The love of homeland that is celebrated in so much of our art and literature. Children’s love of animals, their affection even for reasonable replicas of living things—teddy bears and rubber ducks. The furry seal-eyed robots used to comfort elderly people in Japanese nursing homes. Biophilia enters human hearts and minds in many ways. (Walter Truett Anderson)
Changed lines 7-12 from:
"Biophilia" was apparently coined by the social psychologist and humanistic philosopher [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_Fromm | Eric Fromm]], in his 1964 book ''[[http://books.google.com/books?ei=WT1xSv63Bov8lQTT7ODfDg&id=mQ0sBzIVP8UC&dq=Fromm+heart.of.man&q=biophilia | ''The Heart of Man: Its Genius for Good and Evil'']].  Fromm did not specifically bring ecological concerns to his discussion (ref. Anderson).  However, in his analysis of the Judea-Christian-Islamic creation myth, he identified an allegory that was not just negative, but positive as well: it gave human beings the freedom to "to make [their] own history, to develop [their] human powers, and to attain a new harmony with nature."

Of biophilia's "simpler forms", Walter Truett Anderson wrote:

->... biophilia is everywhere: people walking their dogs and stroking their cats, kneeling in their gardens. The love of homeland that is celebrated in so much of our art and literature. Children’s love of animals, their affection even for reasonable replicas of living things—teddy bears and rubber ducks. The furry seal-eyed robots used to comfort elderly people in Japanese nursing homes. Biophilia enters human hearts and minds in many ways. (Walter Truett Anderson, see ref below).

to:
"Biophilia" was apparently coined by the social psychologist and humanistic philosopher [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_Fromm | Eric Fromm]], in his 1964 book ''[[http://books.google.com/books?ei=WT1xSv63Bov8lQTT7ODfDg&id=mQ0sBzIVP8UC&dq=Fromm+heart.of.man&q=biophilia | ''The Heart of Man: Its Genius for Good and Evil'']].  Fromm did not specifically bring ecological concerns to his discussion (ref. Anderson).  However, in his analysis of the Judeo-Christian creation myth, he identified an allegory that was not just negative, but positive as well: it gave human beings the freedom to "to make [their] own history, to develop [their] human powers, and to attain a new harmony with nature."

July 30, 2009, at 05:25 AM by 220.221.1.130 -
Changed lines 23-24 from:
[[Project Persephone]] is, among other things, an experiment in the limits of biophilia as a motivation for participatory governance.  Does the limited range of species possible in [[exovivari]] also limit affection?  Which affective motivations do the Project's modes of interaction and governance attenuate?  Which do they enhance?
to:
[[Project Persephone]] is, among other things, an experiment in the limits of biophilia as a motivation for participatory governance.  Does the limited range of species possible in [[exovivaria]] also limit affection?  Which affective motivations do the Project's modes of interaction and governance attenuate?  Which do they enhance?
July 30, 2009, at 05:24 AM by 220.221.1.130 -
Changed lines 5-6 from:
"Biophilia" was apparently coined by the social psychologist and humanistic philosopher [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_Fromm | Eric Fromm]], in his book ''[[http://books.google.com/books?ei=WT1xSv63Bov8lQTT7ODfDg&id=mQ0sBzIVP8UC&dq=Fromm+heart.of.man&q=biophilia | ''The Heart of Man: Its Genius for Good and Evil'']].  Fromm did not specifically bring ecological concerns to his discussion (ref. Anderson).  However, in his analysis of the Judea-Christian-Islamic creation myth, he identified an allegory that was not just negative, but positive as well: it gave human beings the freedom to "to make [their] own history, to develop [their] human powers, and to attain a new harmony with nature."
to:
"Biophilia" was apparently coined by the social psychologist and humanistic philosopher [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_Fromm | Eric Fromm]], in his 1964 book ''[[http://books.google.com/books?ei=WT1xSv63Bov8lQTT7ODfDg&id=mQ0sBzIVP8UC&dq=Fromm+heart.of.man&q=biophilia | ''The Heart of Man: Its Genius for Good and Evil'']].  Fromm did not specifically bring ecological concerns to his discussion (ref. Anderson).  However, in his analysis of the Judea-Christian-Islamic creation myth, he identified an allegory that was not just negative, but positive as well: it gave human beings the freedom to "to make [their] own history, to develop [their] human powers, and to attain a new harmony with nature."
Changed lines 13-14 from:
[[Edward O. Wilson]] reinvented the term ''biophilia'' and hypothesized in his book ''Biophilia: The Human Bond with Other Species'' that it was an innate, evolved trait.  The debate over his hypothesized [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociobiology | sociobiological]] underpinnings overshadowed much of the discussion of the idea.
to:
Entomologist and popular science author [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._O._Wilson | Edward O. Wilson]] reinvented the term ''biophilia'' and hypothesized in his 1984 book ''Biophilia: The Human Bond with Other Species'' that biophilia was an innate, evolved trait.  The debate over his hypothesized [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociobiology | sociobiological]] underpinnings overshadowed much of the discussion of the idea.
Changed lines 17-18 from:
Biophilia remains a debatable hypothesis.
to:
Biophilia remains an intuitively appealing but scientifically debatable hypothesis.
July 30, 2009, at 05:22 AM by 220.221.1.130 -
Changed lines 11-12 from:
[[Edward O. Wilson]] reinvented the term ''biophilia'' and hypothesized in his book ''Biophilia: The Human Bond with Other Species'' that it was an innate, evolved trait.
to:
!!! Evolution of the term

[[Edward O. Wilson]] reinvented the term
''biophilia'' and hypothesized in his book ''Biophilia: The Human Bond with Other Species'' that it was an innate, evolved trait.  The debate over his hypothesized [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociobiology | sociobiological]] underpinnings overshadowed much of the discussion of the idea.

It's been hypothesized that the [[Overview Effect]] is a manifestation of biophilia.  This is particularly interesting because, from space, no individual living thing on the ground is visible.

Biophilia remains a debatable hypothesis
.
Changed lines 23-24 from:
[[Project Persephone]] is, among other things, an experiment in the limits of biophilia as a motivation for participatory governance.  Does the limited range of species possible in [[exovivari]]a also limit affection?  Which motivations do the Project's modes of interaction and governance attenuate?  Which do they enhance?
to:
[[Project Persephone]] is, among other things, an experiment in the limits of biophilia as a motivation for participatory governance.  Does the limited range of species possible in [[exovivari]] also limit affection?  Which affective motivations do the Project's modes of interaction and governance attenuate?  Which do they enhance?
July 30, 2009, at 04:53 AM by 220.221.1.130 -
Added lines 24-25:
* "[[http://www.scienceblog.com/community/older/2001/B/200112037.html | Emory scientist reports nature contact may heal humans]]", Emory University Health Sciences Center, March 2001
July 30, 2009, at 04:49 AM by 220.221.1.130 -
Changed lines 15-16 from:
-> Evolutionary governance is richly and unavoidably participatory. It is not even restricted to human activities — predators govern the growth of populations they prey on — but humans, with their ability to make and use tools, organize societies to hunt and gather, burn forests to create pasture, domesticate and breed animals, intervened in countless new ways. And even today, although the inequities in human power are enormous, even the humblest peasant farmer manipulates the lives of the plants and animals in his or her domain; that is what agriculture is.
to:
-> Evolutionary governance is richly and unavoidably participatory. It is not even restricted to human activities — predators govern the growth of populations they prey on — but humans, with their ability to make and use tools, organize societies to hunt and gather, burn forests to create pasture, domesticate and breed animals, intervened in countless new ways. And even today, although the inequities in human power are enormous, even the humblest peasant farmer manipulates the lives of the plants and animals in his or her domain; that is what agriculture is. (Walter Truett Anderson)
July 30, 2009, at 04:48 AM by 220.221.1.130 -
Changed lines 5-6 from:
"Biophilia" was apparently coined by the social psychologist and humanistic philosopher [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_Fromm | Eric Fromm]], in his book ''[[http://books.google.com/books?ei=WT1xSv63Bov8lQTT7ODfDg&id=mQ0sBzIVP8UC&dq=Fromm+heart.of.man&q=biophilia | ''The Heart of Man: Its Genius for Good and Evil'']].  Fromm did not specifically bring ecological concerns to his discussion (ref. Anderson), though in his analysis of the Judea-Christian-Islamic creation myth, he identified an allegory that was not just negative, but positive as well: it gave human beings the freedom to "to make [their] own history, to develop [their] human powers, and to attain a new harmony with nature."
to:
"Biophilia" was apparently coined by the social psychologist and humanistic philosopher [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_Fromm | Eric Fromm]], in his book ''[[http://books.google.com/books?ei=WT1xSv63Bov8lQTT7ODfDg&id=mQ0sBzIVP8UC&dq=Fromm+heart.of.man&q=biophilia | ''The Heart of Man: Its Genius for Good and Evil'']].  Fromm did not specifically bring ecological concerns to his discussion (ref. Anderson).  However, in his analysis of the Judea-Christian-Islamic creation myth, he identified an allegory that was not just negative, but positive as well: it gave human beings the freedom to "to make [their] own history, to develop [their] human powers, and to attain a new harmony with nature."
July 30, 2009, at 04:48 AM by 220.221.1.130 -
Changed lines 5-6 from:
This term was apparently coined by the social psychologist and humanistic philosopher [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_Fromm | Eric Fromm]], in his book ''[[http://books.google.com/books?ei=WT1xSv63Bov8lQTT7ODfDg&id=mQ0sBzIVP8UC&dq=Fromm+heart.of.man&q=biophilia | ''The Heart of Man: Its Genius for Good and Evil'']].  Fromm did not specifically bring ecological concerns to his discussion (ref. Anderson), though in his analysis of the Judea-Christian-Islamic creation myth, he identified an allegory that was not just negative, but positive as well: it gave human beings the freedom to "to make [their] own history, to develop [their] human powers, and to attain a new harmony with nature."
to:
"Biophilia" was apparently coined by the social psychologist and humanistic philosopher [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_Fromm | Eric Fromm]], in his book ''[[http://books.google.com/books?ei=WT1xSv63Bov8lQTT7ODfDg&id=mQ0sBzIVP8UC&dq=Fromm+heart.of.man&q=biophilia | ''The Heart of Man: Its Genius for Good and Evil'']].  Fromm did not specifically bring ecological concerns to his discussion (ref. Anderson), though in his analysis of the Judea-Christian-Islamic creation myth, he identified an allegory that was not just negative, but positive as well: it gave human beings the freedom to "to make [their] own history, to develop [their] human powers, and to attain a new harmony with nature."
GlossyBlue theme adapted by David Gilbert
Powered by PmWiki